Forbereder din AI-samtaleoplevelse...
Initialiserer AI-modeller...
Hvad Europa-Parlamentet gjorde, uge for uge.
Vælg en uge for at åbne den. Kommende uger kan også åbnes.
AI-genereret ud fra EU-Parlamentets officielle protokoller.
Cultural sovereignty, public health and soil law shape a busy plenary
The European Parliament weighed cultural sovereignty, public health and environmental stewardship, while pressing national governments on long-stalled daylight saving reforms.
The European Parliament weighed cultural sovereignty, public health and environmental stewardship, while pressing national governments on long-stalled daylight saving reforms. Lawmakers defended EU audiovisual rules in talks with the United States, advanced policies to combat violence against women, urged equal access to cancer screening, and prepared decisive votes on soil health and other files.
A broad majority urged a firm stance in transatlantic talks on the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). The Commission stressed that the directive applies equally to all providers in the single market and is aligned with global trade rules 1. MEPs cited the market dominance of non-European platforms and the low viewing share for European works to defend quotas and investment obligations 2. A vote on a resolution was scheduled for the same day 3.
The Council underlined the human and economic toll of gender-based violence and set priorities on prevention, early detection and intervention 4. The Commission highlighted the first EU directive on violence against women, including the criminalisation of forced marriage, and support for mothers and children 5. Tensions flared over surrogacy: some called it modern slavery and demanded abolition, while others backed ethical, non-commercial arrangements instead 67.
The Commission reaffirmed the goal that 90% of eligible people should have access to screening for breast, colorectal and cervical cancers 8. MEPs pointed to survival gains from early detection—regular screening can reduce mortality by up to 30%—and pressed for equal access, quality standards and outreach to vulnerable groups 9. A dispute over delays in Spain’s Andalusia region sharpened the focus on transparency and follow-up, with allegations of long waits countered by claims of higher budgets, accountability and an emergency plan 1011.
Ahead of the vote on the Soil Monitoring Law, the rapporteur framed healthy soils as essential to food security and competitiveness, citing the cost of degraded soils and the share of unhealthy land 12. He stressed that the text imposes no obligations or paperwork on farmers and foresters, relies on subsidiarity, and has strong backing in Council 1314. He urged colleagues to defeat “rejection” amendments to enable final adoption 15. Beyond soils, the House called votes on objections to defence-related investEU eligibility, a low-carbon fuels methodology, and measures to curb plastic pellet losses, along with positions on COP30 in Brazil, CITES COP20 objectives, and the AVMSD resolution 161718192021.
MEPs from across the spectrum pressed to abolish seasonal clock changes, citing strong public support—84% of 4.6 million respondents in a Commission consultation—and health and safety concerns 22. One member pointed to spikes in fatal road accidents around the switchovers, while others argued time policy remains a national competence that must reflect social and geographic realities 2324. A Greens/EFA speaker called out stark regional misalignment, such as the two-hour gap between solar and official time in Galicia 25.
Parliament also recorded receipt of Council’s first-reading positions on toy safety and the maritime safety agency, with the formal three‑month window for Parliament to decide its stance starting on 24 October 2025 2627.
Taken together, the debates underscored a Parliament intent on defending cultural diversity, strengthening protections for women and patients, restoring Europe’s soils, and settling a long-running dispute over the clock. Much now hinges on coordinated national implementation and timely follow-through in Council and the Commission.
Forslag om at forkaste forslaget forkastet
Ændringsforslag 2 der tilføjer tekst after § 7: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 3 der tilføjer tekst after § 8: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 16 der tilføjer tekst after § 9: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 13 til After § 12, del 1: vedtaget
Ændringsforslag 13 til After § 12, del 2: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 14 der tilføjer tekst after § 12: vedtaget
§ 14, del 1 beholdt
§ 14, del 2 beholdt
§ 16, del 3 beholdt
Ændringsforslag 5 til § 17: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 11 der tilføjer tekst after § 18: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 9 til § 21: vedtaget
Ændringsforslag 10 til § 23: vedtaget
Ændringsforslag 4 der tilføjer tekst after § 23: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 12 der tilføjer tekst after § 23: forkastet
Ændringsforslag 15 der tilføjer tekst after § 24: vedtaget
§ 27, del 4 beholdt
§ 28, del 2 fjernet
Ændringsforslag 20 til § 30: vedtaget
Recital J, del 1 beholdt
Recital J, del 2 beholdt
Ændringsforslag 7 til Recital K: vedtaget